Rule 10.63. Advisory Committee on Audits and Financial Accountability for the Judicial Branch

(a) Purpose of the rule One of the most important functions of government is to ensure that public funds are properly spent and accounted for. This committee is charged with advising and assisting the council in performing its responsibilities to ensure that the fiscal affairs of the judicial branch are managed efficiently, effectively, and transparently, and in performing its specific responsibilities relating to audits and contracting, as required by law and good public policy.

(b) Area of focus The committee makes recommendations to the council on audits and practices that will promote financial accountability and efficiency in the judicial branch.

(c) Additional duties In addition to the duties specified in rule 10.34, the committee must:

(1) Review and approve a yearly audit plan for the judicial branch that will ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of the judicial branch’s accounting, financial reporting, compliance, and internal control system; review all audit reports of the judicial branch; recommend council action on audit reports that identify substantial issues; approve all other audit reports and have them posted publicly; and, where appropriate, make recommendations to the council on individual or systemic issues identified in audit reports;

(2) Advise and assist the council in performing its responsibilities and exercising its authority under Government Code sections 77009 and 77206 and under part 2.5 of the Public Contract Code (commencing with section 19201; the California Judicial Branch Contract Law);

(3) Review and recommend to the council proposed updates and revisions to theJudicial Branch Contracting Manual; and

(4) Make recommendations concerning any proposed changes to the annual compensation plan for Judicial Council staff.

(d) Membership The committee may include members with experience in public or judicial branch finance and must include at least one member from each of the following categories:

(1) Justices of the Courts of Appeal;

(2) Judges of the superior courts;

(3) Clerk/executive officers of the Courts of Appeal; and

(4) Court executive officers of the superior courts. The committee membership must also include at least one nonvoting advisory member who has significant governmental auditing experience. The California Judges Association will recommend three nominees for a superior court judge position and submit its recommendations to the Executive and Planning Committee of the Judicial Council.

Committee Notes

(Subd (a) adopted effective July 28, 2017.)

(Subd (b) amended and relettered effective July 28, 2017; adopted as subd (a).)

(Subd (c) amended and relettered effective July 28, 2017; adopted as subd (b).)

(Subd (d) amended and relettered effective July 28, 2017; adopted as subd (c).)